Post by lifechanyuan on Mar 4, 2024 5:04:04 GMT
by Xuefeng
Ideas of equality, such as "equality before the Greatest Creator," "all men are created equal," "equality before the law," and "equality of all beings," have deeply ingrained in human consciousness. Upon reflection, I believe these notions of equality have given rise to inequality and deviated from the path of civilization.
Ideas like "egalitarianism," "equalizing wealth," and "common prosperity" seem aimed at eradicating oppression and exploitation, allowing everyone equal access to resources and welfare. However, in essence, they generate greater oppression and exploitation.
Democracy may seem to leverage everyone's intelligence to make decisions and address all emotions and demands. Yet, in reality, it suppresses the saints, stifles the future, allowing erroneous thoughts and flawed systems to persist without correction, spreading continuously.
Is "equality before the Greatest Creator" true? It depends on our understanding. If we acknowledge that everyone must face death, then "equality before the Greatest Creator" is right. If we understand that everyone will receive rewards or punishments based on their actions, then "equality before the Greatest Creator" is also right. But if we believe that everyone before the Greatest Creator must be equally handsome, equally beautiful, equally tall, enjoy the same benefits, eat two buns every meal, and meet the same fate, then "equality before the Greatest Creator" is wrong.
Is "all men are created equal" true? Are they all born in royal or wealthy families or in slums? Are they all born with attractive features? Undoubtedly, everyone is not born equal. The true meaning of "all men are created equal" is that no one should face discrimination or oppression due to factors like birth, wealth, or intelligence, rather than being identical in all aspects from birth.
Is "equality before the law" true? The laws of the wolves towards sheep are definitely unequal laws. Those in power can arbitrarily label others as "illegal" and impose sanctions. Therefore, "equality before the law" is an empty phrase.
Whether it's " equalizing wealth," "egalitarianism," or "common prosperity," all entail severe exploitation and oppression. If A produces 10 watermelons and B produces two, then dividing six each between A and B is a form of exploitation and oppression for A, as well as a strike against one's initiative, creativity, and enthusiasm for work.
What is civilization?
Civilization is about justice, not equality, uniformity, or democracy.
Civilization involves ensuring that the creators of wealth can securely enjoy the fruits of their labor. Protecting homes built through one's labor from external disturbances is civilization. Safeguarding the weak from the bullying of the strong is civilization. Allowing every individual's nature to flourish without constraints is civilization. Ensuring provisions for the elderly and care for the young is civilization.
It is just for someone who hasn't contributed to face starvation or death by hunger, but it is undeniably unjust for someone who consistently contributes to experience the same fate. If laborers have food, clothing, shelter, and freedom of movement, that signifies a civilized society. If laborers have no way out, it contradicts civilization.
Justice treats everyone impartially, without favoring a minority or majority, those in power or the masses, the rich or the poor, the elite or those with average intelligence and abilities.
Immediate punishment for wrongdoers symbolizes societal civilization. A delayed punishment for wrongdoers, by two or three years, indicates that the entire society has not yet embraced the path of civilization and remains in a state of barbarism.
My viewpoint is that the pursuit of equality, uniformity, and democracy will not lead humanity into a civilized society. Only by pursuing justice can humanity enter a civilized society.
Ideas of equality, such as "equality before the Greatest Creator," "all men are created equal," "equality before the law," and "equality of all beings," have deeply ingrained in human consciousness. Upon reflection, I believe these notions of equality have given rise to inequality and deviated from the path of civilization.
Ideas like "egalitarianism," "equalizing wealth," and "common prosperity" seem aimed at eradicating oppression and exploitation, allowing everyone equal access to resources and welfare. However, in essence, they generate greater oppression and exploitation.
Democracy may seem to leverage everyone's intelligence to make decisions and address all emotions and demands. Yet, in reality, it suppresses the saints, stifles the future, allowing erroneous thoughts and flawed systems to persist without correction, spreading continuously.
Is "equality before the Greatest Creator" true? It depends on our understanding. If we acknowledge that everyone must face death, then "equality before the Greatest Creator" is right. If we understand that everyone will receive rewards or punishments based on their actions, then "equality before the Greatest Creator" is also right. But if we believe that everyone before the Greatest Creator must be equally handsome, equally beautiful, equally tall, enjoy the same benefits, eat two buns every meal, and meet the same fate, then "equality before the Greatest Creator" is wrong.
Is "all men are created equal" true? Are they all born in royal or wealthy families or in slums? Are they all born with attractive features? Undoubtedly, everyone is not born equal. The true meaning of "all men are created equal" is that no one should face discrimination or oppression due to factors like birth, wealth, or intelligence, rather than being identical in all aspects from birth.
Is "equality before the law" true? The laws of the wolves towards sheep are definitely unequal laws. Those in power can arbitrarily label others as "illegal" and impose sanctions. Therefore, "equality before the law" is an empty phrase.
Whether it's " equalizing wealth," "egalitarianism," or "common prosperity," all entail severe exploitation and oppression. If A produces 10 watermelons and B produces two, then dividing six each between A and B is a form of exploitation and oppression for A, as well as a strike against one's initiative, creativity, and enthusiasm for work.
What is civilization?
Civilization is about justice, not equality, uniformity, or democracy.
Civilization involves ensuring that the creators of wealth can securely enjoy the fruits of their labor. Protecting homes built through one's labor from external disturbances is civilization. Safeguarding the weak from the bullying of the strong is civilization. Allowing every individual's nature to flourish without constraints is civilization. Ensuring provisions for the elderly and care for the young is civilization.
It is just for someone who hasn't contributed to face starvation or death by hunger, but it is undeniably unjust for someone who consistently contributes to experience the same fate. If laborers have food, clothing, shelter, and freedom of movement, that signifies a civilized society. If laborers have no way out, it contradicts civilization.
Justice treats everyone impartially, without favoring a minority or majority, those in power or the masses, the rich or the poor, the elite or those with average intelligence and abilities.
Immediate punishment for wrongdoers symbolizes societal civilization. A delayed punishment for wrongdoers, by two or three years, indicates that the entire society has not yet embraced the path of civilization and remains in a state of barbarism.
My viewpoint is that the pursuit of equality, uniformity, and democracy will not lead humanity into a civilized society. Only by pursuing justice can humanity enter a civilized society.
